I was less nervous than last time. To be honest, I didn't like to watch my video, but I had to watch!!!!
I think the ratio of T-talk to S-talk was almost 45% of students and 55% of me, I reminded let me talk slow and less at this time, it was one of my objectives.
0:9-0:12: I start to speak too slow and boring. The beginning was not interested, even my speaking was not powerful and not clear. I think boring beginning do not get much attention from students.
0:00-1:19 I didn't give to students chances to speak.
1:30 Here was my C.I start! I think it's late a little bit.
2:19 T-S Here is again, I spoke to Jason too slowly, he is 20 years old University student, I think I forgot student profile.
I think my view is very narrow. I only looked the centre of the students. Like Mina, Megan, Kyle, Janson, Ish, and Tom. I didn't see the two sides corner student who were Andrew and Jason D. Students take turn was not fair. Two side students Andrew and Jason never had chances to speak.
I think Q1 and Q2 conversation were pretty good. T-S-S-S.
We discussed about the topic and thought, students had chances to express their thought or idea.
4:28 Tom had a wrong answer, I don't like the way to get answer from Tom. It's like to ask YES/NO!
It's really like to get their agreement to confirm my right answer. This way is too passive. I think this way is little bit dangerous, students have own right to think, but I interrupted too much!
I think this is not teaching.
It means that I am telling to them my thought is always right. I should think other way to get right answer.
6:23 I explain too much about my idea and then get agreement from students.
Q3-Q4 were not really discussed in the class. I think I lost somewhere in the middle of the class.
I felt 10min was long for me. Why? I think the structure of the plan was not correct.
The topic of the article was culture difference concept, but student didn't get the concept of the article.
Students were ready to listen and discuss the reading in the class, I think real class and students would be little bit different. My teaching style was not interesting, I think it is just standard and formal teaching. I was communicative between students and I. I saw I was too busy in my last video, but I was not too busy and rush in #2 micro teaching. Even I didn't understand what I was doing in #1 micro teaching. I was more comfortable than #1. I usually speak too fast Korean, too.
I think that I am transferring L1 speech habit to English teaching either. I think that I speak too slow and unnatural way at that time. I don't like #2 micro teaching.
I planned WB from my lesson plan stage. I was not planned MIC techniques in my lesson plan script, but it was reflected while I was teaching. I am not talking very active, some people talk very interesting way, as an EFL teacher it is very important skills. It's boring and boring again!!!!
I forgot to give them feedback like oh really, good, correct and ect. It is very important to encourage students to speak. My teaching style is like a toeic, OMG!!! I don't like toeic or toefl.
I really would like to be a language teacher~
My teaching was not interactive with students generally, I think I should develop C.Is.
I think I still need more practice to teach more naturally.