I am thinking about my teaching method this week. How many times do I using turn taking, open display questions, and scaffolding etc. I always think my class is pretty obstructive. I am only one person talking to the students, they are just listening. I know it is wrong way to teach...
I got some idea what is real interactivity even students don't understand English. Tom's bottle activity and Connie's card game was very interesting to me. Even Tom spoke different language, I got the meaning of what he was saying. He said "Who's bottle is it?" I guess.
I think that they always curious about what I am saying, what is the best English lesson for them?
Direct answering is the best, but it is not correct way. I am thinking of scaffolding.
To explain Octopus is that octo means 8, the sea animal has eight arms like that.
I am thinking about the way explain vocabularies, students don't have much schema in their mind.
It is very hard group than adult or University level student.
I believe that foundation is the most difficult level.
I am thinking more about interactivity using the most meaningful English vocabularies.
Yes, it's time to change!!!
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Friday, September 14, 2012
Week3: Module1 reflection
I started to think about TTT during my lesson. What types of students' turn taking I'm using?
Constructive or obstructive?
How can I answer student questions to avoid direct answers.
Am I interrupt students' dialogue or chances to speak?
Right! Let's use scaffolding, this is right!
I usually corrected their errors as much as I can, sometime I feel like that I am a Human English dictionary.
My elementary students are usually asking me meanings of words, they don't know exactly how to use a dictionary, even they can't memorize the meanings of the words. Explain again.
This type of CI makes students very boring and no attention from students. I can play a game all the time to make class interesting.
This is my dilemma in my class.
Constructive or obstructive?
How can I answer student questions to avoid direct answers.
Am I interrupt students' dialogue or chances to speak?
Right! Let's use scaffolding, this is right!
I usually corrected their errors as much as I can, sometime I feel like that I am a Human English dictionary.
My elementary students are usually asking me meanings of words, they don't know exactly how to use a dictionary, even they can't memorize the meanings of the words. Explain again.
This type of CI makes students very boring and no attention from students. I can play a game all the time to make class interesting.
This is my dilemma in my class.
Thursday, September 6, 2012
week 2 warm-up
I am thinking about how can I improve my teaching more effectively using the terms learned from STG class.
It was quite difficult to apply the techniques, I realized that I am still using my own teaching habit.
I started to analyzed my lesson video to correct my own proficiency problems as well. I never think about the way.
My T talks are quite monologic and constructive. I attempted students are involved as much as they can, however CI is very limited because of their language proficiency.
I usually asked many of closed, display, and eliciting types of questions.
I never tried high & lower level questions type in my class.
I am teaching my elementary kids traditional way some part of my lesson.
Reading comprehension and answering multiple questions, this is the most standard way to prepare a test/quiz.
I hope that my students get high score for a quiz / level test. This way is very effective way to get the score, most parents or students are demanding the high score.
I feel like Korea has two types English.
Test English (reading, grammar, vocabulary) and Communicative English (essay writing, speaking, presentation).
Students are stressed too much to follow two different types.
I am still thinking how can I solve this matter?
It was quite difficult to apply the techniques, I realized that I am still using my own teaching habit.
I started to analyzed my lesson video to correct my own proficiency problems as well. I never think about the way.
My T talks are quite monologic and constructive. I attempted students are involved as much as they can, however CI is very limited because of their language proficiency.
I usually asked many of closed, display, and eliciting types of questions.
I never tried high & lower level questions type in my class.
I am teaching my elementary kids traditional way some part of my lesson.
Reading comprehension and answering multiple questions, this is the most standard way to prepare a test/quiz.
I hope that my students get high score for a quiz / level test. This way is very effective way to get the score, most parents or students are demanding the high score.
I feel like Korea has two types English.
Test English (reading, grammar, vocabulary) and Communicative English (essay writing, speaking, presentation).
Students are stressed too much to follow two different types.
I am still thinking how can I solve this matter?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)